RF3 vs Forte 2 - The Klipsch Community
in
Advanced Search
KLIPSCH - The Ultimate Sound Experience

RF3 vs Forte 2

Last post 11-17-2009 8:17 AM by stormin. 21 replies.
Page 1 of 2 (22 items) 1 2 Next >
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 11-03-2009 3:42 PM

    RF3 vs Forte 2

    hi there im a klipsch rf 3 recent owner and wud like to know if i can hv my hands on a forte 2 klipsch ,wud that be an upgrade from the rf3s or not . ill be using my quad 303 pre power amp to power em , n im a music man mostly . plz help out and suggest something quick. thanks in advance
    quadklipsh


    KLIPSCH RF 3s,
    QUAD 303
    DIATONE DA-A7
    MARANTZ 2230
    SONY CD-P X33 ES
    PIONEER DVS-9


  • 11-03-2009 7:21 PM In reply to

    • Johnlw7
    • Not Ranked
    • Joined on 12-09-2006
    • Harrison,Ar.
    • Posts 319

    Re: RF3 vs Forte 2

    The Forte 2's will best the Rf3 in my opinion by a good margin.They are one of the most popular Klipsch speakers.i have had 4 pairs.All gone.

  • 11-03-2009 7:51 PM In reply to

    • dtel
    • Top 25 Contributor
    • Joined on 03-01-2003
    • South Mississippi
    • Posts 12,251

    Re: RF3 vs Forte 2

    The forte ll will be better than the RF3 by far, IMO.  I use them for 5.1 HT but there a very good 2 CH speaker.

    "Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving
    safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways,
    Champagne in one hand - strawberries with whipped cream in the other hand, body
    thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming WOO HOO - What a Ride!"

  • 11-03-2009 9:17 PM In reply to

    Re: RF3 vs Forte 2

    IMHO, yes, the Forte II (I'm an owner) is going to be a significant step up.  I may have heard the '3s long ago at Klipsch and they are good. There were many demoed for us at a Pilgrimage.

    My guess is that Klipsch went to the RF series to have a product which is stylishly tall and thin -- and reach price points.

    However, in my view, the Forte II must work better because of the greater area of the direct radiator, the big passsive radiator, the large tractrix midrange, and the tweeter.  Those items made it expensive to manufacture and, in comparison, not so thin.

    I'd suggest you find some Forte II, Quartets, or Chorus II.

    Wm McD

     

  • 11-03-2009 11:48 PM In reply to

    Re: RF3 vs Forte 2

    Perhaps the fact that I used to have RF-7s and replaced them with Forte IIs will tell you something.
    Mark
    Klipsch Chorus I '89 - Walnut Oil - Bob Crites Ti tweeter diaphragms / Klipsch K-53 Ti midrange diaphragms
    Klipsch KG4 - '89 - Finished Black
    Outlaw Audio LFM-1 Plus subwoofer (Max output mode)
    Panasonic SA-XR57 fully digital receiver
    Toshiba HD-A30 HD-DVD player
    Sony 120GB PS3
    Nintendo Wii
    Sharp LC-70LE732U 70" Aquos Quattron LED HDTV
    DirecTV HD dish
    APC C10 Power Filter
  • 11-04-2009 12:44 AM In reply to

    • dtel
    • Top 25 Contributor
    • Joined on 03-01-2003
    • South Mississippi
    • Posts 12,251

    Re: RF3 vs Forte 2

    wuzzzer:
    Perhaps the fact that I used to have RF-7s and replaced them with Forte IIs will tell you something.

     

    And the RF 7 would kill a Rf 3, not that the RF 3 were bad, just not as good IMO. 

    "Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving
    safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways,
    Champagne in one hand - strawberries with whipped cream in the other hand, body
    thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming WOO HOO - What a Ride!"

  • 11-15-2009 8:16 AM In reply to

    Re: RF3 vs Forte 2

    dear william .mc d

    i dont get it , why would a more newer speaker (rf-3) or any of the reference line gear,  be less of a pleasure than the oldier models , which were bulit in times of lesser technology and lower tech machinery in those same  factories owned by the same company ;)  

    and

    why are the so called AV speakers always less pleasing or less  desirable than the older MUSIC dedicated  speakers like heritage series or the legends.

     

     

    quadklipsh


    KLIPSCH RF 3s,
    QUAD 303
    DIATONE DA-A7
    MARANTZ 2230
    SONY CD-P X33 ES
    PIONEER DVS-9


  • 11-15-2009 9:20 AM In reply to

    • Bill H.
    • Top 50 Contributor
    • Joined on 09-28-2000
    • Bonita Springs, FL !
    • Posts 6,934

    Re: RF3 vs Forte 2

     Forte is a 3 way speaker.  Fuller, richer and Much smoother sound.  IMHO

     I truly wish Klipsch could find a way to update this speaker and bring it Back, but I also understand it would not be cost efficient to do this...............

     


  • 11-15-2009 3:10 PM In reply to

    Re: RF3 vs Forte 2

    i listened to a forte 2 coupled with an adcom

    the experience was nothing special

    i came home and had a detailed listen to the same tracks on my bookshelf spkrs

    and  i dreadfully say that the klipsch adcom combo had failed to  impress me

     

    itt felt as though the highs from that super tweeter were restrained and the amp wudnt

    let go the speakers to brighten up on the highs range

    i felt as if there were no tweeters

    Tongue Tied

    quadklipsh


    KLIPSCH RF 3s,
    QUAD 303
    DIATONE DA-A7
    MARANTZ 2230
    SONY CD-P X33 ES
    PIONEER DVS-9


  • 11-15-2009 4:39 PM In reply to

    Re: RF3 vs Forte 2

    My first experience with Forte's was the same, only they were hooked up to Marantz. They sounded flat and lifeless. After all the reading I had done on Forte's/Klipsch, I knew it had to be the amp,  I bought them anyway. After I got them home and hooked up to my Carver's they came to life in a BIG way. I bought a Denon AVR 3805 and they sound great!  I now own 3 pair of Forte's Big Smile



  • 11-15-2009 4:58 PM In reply to

    Re: RF3 vs Forte 2

    Get a modern SS setup to power your RF-3 HT and a vintage Marantz or tubes to power a pair of Forte's for 2 channel. 

    The main reason I think the Heritage/extended Heritage line of speakers sound better for 2 channel is the midrange horn.

    Take a look at my system setups at bottom of page.  Forte's and Quartet's sound awesome with low power vintage or high power seperates.

    Bill

    Family Room(5.3 System)

    Klipsch RF-63(cherry) Fronts
    Klipsch RC-64(cherry) Center
    Klipsch RS-35 Surrounds
    Klipsch RSW-10d(cherry) Subwoofer
    Revel B15(cherry) Subwoofer
    SVS SB13 Plus(cherry) Subwoofer
    NAD T175HD Preamp/Processor
    Acurus A200 2-channel Amp(200w/ch)---driving RF-63 fronts
    Acurus A200x3 3-channel Amp(200w/ch)---driving RC-64 center and RS-35 surrounds
    Oppo BDP-83 Universal Player
    Dish VIP211k HD
    Monster HDP 2400
    Samsung PN59D6500 Plasma TV

    Family Room (Vintage 80's 90's 2-channel System)

    Klipsch(1994) Quartets(oak oil)
    Denon PMA-1080R Integrated Amp(105w/ch)
    Denon TU-800 Tuner
    Denon DCD-3520 CD Player
    Denon DCM-440 5-Disk CD Player
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    View entire gear profile






  • 11-15-2009 10:49 PM In reply to

    Re: RF3 vs Forte 2

    quadklipsh:

    i listened to a forte 2 coupled with an adcom

    the experience was nothing special

     

    i dreadfully say that the klipsch adcom combo had failed to  impress me

    Well thats no surprise. There have been many of us preaching that for years. Adcom + Klipsch especially the Forte II/Chorus II is a big fat no no.

     

    Klipsch-Jolida-Yamaha-Crown-HRT

    50% Pro + 50% Consumer = 100% Kick A$$
  • 11-16-2009 2:06 AM In reply to

    Re: RF3 vs Forte 2

    hi there willland

    thats a heck of a rack of gear uv got !!! great job man

    can u tell how much the stuff has been costing u

    also plz suggest  prices for chorus and fortes and of quartets equally

    well

    given the small differences in the looks are these extended heritage speakers any different in their

    sounds too?

    and wot differences were made in the mk 2 of each of these

    plz illuminate

     

    quadklipsh


    KLIPSCH RF 3s,
    QUAD 303
    DIATONE DA-A7
    MARANTZ 2230
    SONY CD-P X33 ES
    PIONEER DVS-9


  • 11-16-2009 2:16 AM In reply to

    Re: RF3 vs Forte 2

     

    dear romak

    isnt that a mix between analogue kind speaker and a digital amp

    i mean the 3805 vs the klipsches u hv

    plus who so ever does a denon or a yamaha with the klipsches ,i just feel hes not doin justice,and his sound outcome  wud stay

    amateur

    pls share ur experiences

     

    quadklipsh


    KLIPSCH RF 3s,
    QUAD 303
    DIATONE DA-A7
    MARANTZ 2230
    SONY CD-P X33 ES
    PIONEER DVS-9


  • 11-16-2009 11:05 AM In reply to

    • smokarz
    • Top 500 Contributor
    • Joined on 03-13-2009
    • West Hartford, CT
    • Posts 942

    Re: RF3 vs Forte 2

    willland:

    Get a modern SS setup to power your RF-3 HT and a vintage Marantz or tubes to power a pair of Forte's for 2 channel

    The main reason I think the Heritage/extended Heritage line of speakers sound better for 2 channel is the midrange horn.

    Take a look at my system setups at bottom of page.  Forte's and Quartet's sound awesome with low power vintage or high power seperates.

    Bill

     Sorry, don't mean to hijack, but when you say 'vintage marantz', what models specifically? And does that statement also apply to the Cornwalls? thanks

    ***5.1 HT Setup***
    ++ Integra 9.9
    ++ Emotiva UPA-7
    ++ Behringer EP2500
    ++ 2x Crites CS1 Speakers
    ++ 3x 4pi Speakers (coming soon)
    ++ 4x MFW-15 DIY Subs
    ++ Sony S360 Bluray .1
    ++ AMD/ATI HTPC
    ++ APC H10
    ++ Optoma HD65 720p Projector
    ++ 80" DIY WA DW Screen





Page 1 of 2 (22 items) 1 2 Next >
©2009 Klipsch Audio Technologies. All rights reserved.