I wanted to replace my RT-12D. I got 2 JL f113's for 40% off list.

Why so dwn on the F113? I have the RT-12d and it's not the cat's meow. I was looking to get the F113. I also considered the SVS PB-13Ultra. I am still so confused.

It's good to get affirmation of function. The guys at AVS forum loved the JL but then it became almost as worthless as a sub included in a HTIB. The tides turned and everyone jumped on the SVS pb-13B and subsequent Seaton Submersive bandwagon. I have never heard a SVS. It looks nolt as well made as the JL but the SVS fan boys taut it's build. The SVS is price attractive but I want to upgrade only once. $6000 is alot for 2 subs but if I will have them for a long time and I won't be looking

I decided to get JL audio subs. I want to integrate with MY Klipsch RF-63's. I want dual subs. Should I get the two f112's or two f113's? I want low end extension and good sound with HT and music.

Why did you choose the SVS over the JL f113?

Talk about the run-on sentence

[quote user="Professor Thump"]You might also experiment with a crossover frequency at 40 Hz to the sub[/quote] Professor, Since you designed them you are the perfect one to ask. I have been playing with my Xovers for a long time,: I can't seem to get the right sound. I have the RF-63's RC-64 RS 62 and RT-12d. My sub seems to have little output and visceral impact. I seem to get more dynamic range from the RF-63's. What x-overs should I use? I feel the RT-12d is lacking.

I set the Integra to have the followng crossovers: Fronts 60HZ Center 80HZ Surrounds 80HZ LPF off on the sub High pass on Receiver 80HZ I set the sub volume with receiver +3 over volume match of other speakers. Occsionally I turn up volume on sub +3-6 db . I think I can hear the PR flapping durin intense bass.

I wanted input from an impartial source. AVS forums has alot of SVS fan-boys.

will anyone even open the post ?